 | #13 Nebraska |
| Lincoln, NE - Big Ten |
2025-2026 Schedule
Note: Game results highlighted in green indicate that the team exceeded expectations, even if it was a loss. Games highlighted in red indicate that the team failed to meet expectations, even if it was a win.
| Date | Opponent | Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs |  | West Georgia | W 86 - 53 |
| Nov 8 | vs |  | Florida International | W 96 - 66 |
| Nov 11 | vs |  | Maryland Eastern Shore | W 69 - 50 |
| Nov 15 | (N) |  | Oklahoma | W 105 - 99 |
| Nov 20 | (N) |  | New Mexico | W 84 - 72 |
| Nov 21 | (N) |  | Kansas St | W 86 - 85 |
| Nov 25 | vs |  | Winthrop | W 80 - 73 |
| Nov 29 | vs |  | USC Upstate | W 72 - 63 |
| Dec 7 | vs |  | Creighton | W 71 - 50 |
| Dec 10 | vs |  | #24 Wisconsin | W 90 - 60 |
| Dec 13 | @ |  | #10 Illinois | W 83 - 80 |
| Dec 21 | vs |  | North Dakota | W 78 - 55 |
| Dec 30 | vs |  | New Hampshire | W 86 - 55 |
| Jan 2 | vs |  | #9 Michigan St | W 58 - 56 |
| Jan 5 | @ |  | #23 Ohio St | W 72 - 69 |
| Jan 10 | @ |  | Indiana | W 83 - 77 |
| Jan 13 | vs |  | Oregon | W 90 - 55 |
| Jan 17 | @ |  | Northwestern | W 77 - 58 |
| Jan 21 | vs |  | Washington | W 76 - 66 |
| Jan 24 | @ |  | Minnesota | W 76 - 57 |
| Jan 27 | @ |  | #2 Michigan | L 75 - 72 |
| Feb 1 | vs | | #10 Illinois | L 78 - 69 |
| Feb 7 | @ |  | Rutgers | W 80 - 68 |
| Feb 10 | vs |  | #7 Purdue | L 80 - 77 (OT) |
| Feb 14 | vs | | Northwestern | W 68 - 49 |
| Feb 17 | @ |  | Iowa | L 57 - 52 |
| Feb 21 | vs |  | Penn St | W 87 - 64 |
| Feb 25 | vs |  | Maryland | W 74 - 61 |
| Feb 28 | @ |  | Southern California | W 82 - 67 |
| Mar 3 | @ |  | UCLA | L 72 - 52 |
| Mar 8 | vs | | Iowa | W 84 - 75 (OT) |
| Mar 13 | (N) | | #7 Purdue | L 74 - 58 |
Stats
| Overall | ||
|---|---|---|
| Record | 26-6 | |
| vs Conference | 15-6 | |
| vs Top 50 | 6-6 | |
| Adj. Predicted Win % | 0.893 [13 nationally, 5th in Big Ten] | |
| Adj. Efficiency Delta | 25.6 [21] | |
| Strength of schedule | 51st | |
| Adj. Pace | 67.6 [211] | |
| Avg. Margin | 11.1 [19] | |
| Consistency | 205th | |
| 3-point % | 35.3 [105] | |
| 3-point Ratio | 50.9 [10] | |
| Free Throw % | 75 [85] | |
| Offense | Defense | |
| Adjusted Efficiency | 118.6 [49] | 93 [10] |
| Adjusted Four Factors - Offense | ||
| Value | Correlation | |
| Effective FG% | 56.4 [43] | 0.79 [246] |
| Offensive Turnover % | 14.6 [60] | -0.55 [48] |
| Offensive Rebound % | 27.9 [251] | 0.32 [192] |
| Free Throw Rate | 27.9 [340] | -0 [362] |
| Adjusted Four Factors - Defense | ||
| Value | Correlation | |
| Opponent Effective FG% | 46.3 [20] | 0.85 [114] |
| Defensive Turnover % | 21.1 [9] | -0.51 [94] |
| Defensive Rebound % | 74.7 [25] | -0.48 [61] |
| Opponent Free Throw Rate | 23.5 [6] | 0.4 [33] |
Note: Kalman filter settling time is responsible for some of the early season variance.