 | #89 Southern California |
| Los Angeles, CA - Big Ten |
2025-2026 Schedule
Note: Game results highlighted in green indicate that the team exceeded expectations, even if it was a loss. Games highlighted in red indicate that the team failed to meet expectations, even if it was a win.
| Date | Opponent | Score | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs |  | Cal Poly | W 94 - 64 |
| Nov 9 | vs |  | Manhattan | W 114 - 83 |
| Nov 14 | (N) |  | Illinois St | W 87 - 67 |
| Nov 20 | vs |  | Troy | W 107 - 106 (3 OT) |
| Nov 24 | (N) |  | Boise St | W 70 - 67 |
| Nov 25 | (N) |  | Seton Hall | W 83 - 81 |
| Nov 26 | (N) |  | Arizona St | W 88 - 75 |
| Dec 2 | @ |  | Oregon | W 82 - 77 |
| Dec 6 | vs |  | Washington | L 84 - 76 |
| Dec 9 | @ |  | San Diego | W 94 - 81 |
| Dec 14 | vs |  | Washington State | W 68 - 61 |
| Dec 17 | vs |  | Texas San Antonio | W 97 - 70 |
| Jan 2 | @ |  | #2 Michigan | L 96 - 66 |
| Jan 5 | @ |  | #9 Michigan St | L 80 - 51 |
| Jan 9 | @ |  | Minnesota | W 70 - 69 (OT) |
| Jan 13 | vs |  | Maryland | W 88 - 71 |
| Jan 17 | vs |  | #5 Purdue | L 69 - 64 |
| Jan 21 | vs |  | Northwestern | L 74 - 68 |
| Jan 25 | @ |  | #25 Wisconsin | W 73 - 71 |
| Jan 28 | @ |  | Iowa | L 73 - 72 |
| Jan 31 | vs |  | Rutgers | W 78 - 75 |
| Feb 3 | vs |  | Indiana | W 81 - 75 |
| Feb 8 | @ |  | Penn St | W 77 - 75 |
| Feb 11 | @ |  | #23 Ohio St | L 89 - 82 |
| Feb 18 | vs |  | #8 Illinois | L 101 - 65 |
| Feb 21 | vs | | Oregon | L 71 - 70 |
| Feb 24 | @ |  | UCLA | L 81 - 62 |
| Feb 28 | vs |  | #15 Nebraska | L 82 - 67 |
| Mar 4 | @ | | Washington | L 91 - 72 |
| Mar 7 | vs | | UCLA | L 89 - 68 |
| Mar 11 | (N) | | Washington | L 83 - 79 (OT) |
Stats
| Overall | ||
|---|---|---|
| Record | 17-14 | |
| vs Conference | 7-14 | |
| vs Top 50 | 2-9 | |
| Adj. Predicted Win % | 0.668 [89] | |
| Adj. Efficiency Δ | 9.7 [87] | |
| Strength of schedule | 41st | |
| Adj. Pace | 71.7 [22] | |
| Avg. Margin | -0.6 [191] | |
| Consistency | 264th | |
| 3-point % | 31.7 [293] | |
| 3-point Ratio | 34 [297] | |
| Free Throw % | 72.6 [183] | |
| Offense | Defense | |
| Adjusted Efficiency | 113.3 [91] | 103.6 [89] |
| Adjusted Four Factors - Offense | ||
| Value | Correlation | |
| Effective FG% | 52.4 [143] | 0.79 [241] |
| Offensive Turnover % | 17 [242] | -0.33 [221] |
| Offensive Rebound % | 34.1 [64] | 0.57 [21] |
| Free Throw Rate | 47.8 [2] | 0.16 [188] |
| Adjusted Four Factors - Defense | ||
| Value | Correlation | |
| Opponent Effective FG% | 49.2 [88] | 0.77 [269] |
| Defensive Turnover % | 17.3 [119] | -0.58 [50] |
| Defensive Rebound % | 71.2 [135] | -0.31 [193] |
| Opponent Free Throw Rate | 33.2 [143] | 0.15 [200] |
Note: Kalman filter settling time is responsible for some of the early season variance.